This is a sample. A real audit of a real practice, shown with identifying details removed.

The audit is the scorecard itself. The review is the thirty minutes we spend going through it together.

FAx

VISIBILITY
SCORECARD

Specimen IX, a Nashville solo-brand surgical practice
specimen-ix.example.com · July 28, 2026 · Tier 1 audit · Rubric v1.1
15
signals measured
Sample scorecard
More once we complete the manual review together.
Executive summary

Your practice, which puts your visibility in the room-for-improvement range. Patients already find you in AI search, but the moment they land on your site there is no way to book in real time, so interest leaks out before it becomes a consultation. That gap is worth a conversation.

What the audit found

Strengths

+You show up in AI search answersContent and discoverability

Across 90 AI answers, your practice was named in 30 percent and your site was cited with a link in 25 percent. When patients ask ChatGPT or Google's AI for a surgeon, you appear and get the click.

+Real patient stories, not just star ratingsReputation and proof

You have written testimonials tied to specific procedures like Morpheus8 and mommy makeover, plus video. This is the kind of proof patients read closely before choosing a surgeon, and yours is strong.

+Dedicated pages for named proceduresWebsite and booking

You have individual pages for flagship treatments like facelift, rhinoplasty, and Botox rather than one buried list. This gives patients a clear answer for each procedure they are researching.

+Award-level presence on an aesthetic directoryIdentity and listings

Your RealSelf profile is active and award-recognized (RealSelf 100, Hall of Fame). Patients who compare surgeons on aesthetic directories see a credible, managed presence.

Costliest gaps

No real-time booking on your siteWebsite and booking

Your "Book Here" button routes to a contact form, not a live scheduler. Patients ready to commit have to wait for a callback, and some book with a practice that lets them pick a time now.

No services listed on your Google profileLocal presence and Google

Your Google Business Profile shows no services menu and no website link. Patients scanning the map see less about what you offer, so you are more likely to lose them to a fuller profile.

No financing information anywhere on the siteWebsite and booking

Cost is a common reason patients hesitate on elective procedures. With no payment-plan language visible, price-sensitive patients tend to drop off before booking a consultation.

Your blog has gone quietContent and discoverability

Your newest post is about seven months old across roughly 110 posts. Patients and AI search both read staleness as a less active practice, which can push them toward a competitor who looks current.

Slow mobile siteWebsite and booking

Your mobile speed score is 38 out of 100. Most patients research on their phones, and a slow load makes some leave before they see your work.

The path forward

Discuss the findings

Let's talk through what your visibility is costing you in consultations and where the fastest ground is. A short conversation turns this snapshot into a clear plan.

Lazar preps before the call: no real-time booking on your site, and no services listed on your Google profile, both mapped in advance, plus every item marked In your review, ready to walk through together.

Book your 30-minute review →

Lazar LaLone · lazar@fractionalaesthetics.com · (412) 944-5506

Methodology

The goal: a diagnostic read of what a patient, or a referring doctor, sees from the outside, working only from what is openly on display and never from the practice's own dashboards or private analytics. It intentionally does not prescribe fixes, because effective solutions need further conversation and analysis to get right.

Rubric
Aesthetic Practice Visibility Scorecard v1.1, 100-point composite
Two kinds of number
Scores of 0 to 3 are ours, applied from this rubric. Figures such as Google's PageSpeed result, your star rating, review counts and follower counts are third-party measurements we read and report, not numbers we assign
This audit
Tier 1, the complimentary read. Every one of the 34 signals is drawn from patient-facing data. Tier 2 adds paid-media spend analysis, and only when you choose to share your ad data.
Signals
15 measured from patient-facing data so far; the rest walked through together in your review
Review items
Excluded from both earned and maximum points; they never count against the practice, and we look at them together in your review
Generated
July 28, 2026
Category breakdown
IN YOUR REVIEW = these signals need a closer look than patient-facing data alone allows, so we walk through them together in your review. They are excluded from the score entirely and never count against the practice.
1Local Search Visibility
23%
Your Google Business Profile is claimed and has hours, categories, and accessibility details. It is missing a services menu, a website link, and an active Q&A section. Patients comparing you on the map results (the map results on Google) see a thinner listing and are more likely to click a fuller one. Several items here need a closer look together.
1.1 GBP Claim & Completeness 2 / 3
1.2 GBP Categories In your review
1.3 Service Menu on GBP 0 / 3
1.4 GBP Photo Volume & Recency In your review
1.5 GBP Posts Frequency In your review
1.6 Local Pack Presence (Primary Terms) In your review
1.7 Q&A Section Activation 0 / 3
2Website & Infrastructure
40%
You have solid procedure pages, but the path to book breaks down. Your booking button goes to a contact form instead of a live scheduler, the mobile site scores 38 out of 100, and no financing appears anywhere. Ready-to-book patients hit friction and some leave for an easier path.
2.1 Mobile Speed Score 1 / 3
2.2 Above-the-Fold Booking CTA 2 / 3
2.3 Online Scheduling Integration 1 / 3
2.4 Branded Treatment Page Coverage 2 / 3
2.5 Financing Surfacing 0 / 3
3Reputation, Trust & Innovation
50%
This is a real strength. Your written and video patient testimonials, tied to specific procedures, are exactly what patients read before choosing a surgeon. The gap is innovation and first-mover positioning, which is absent, so you look similar to peers rather than distinct. Your review depth and gallery need a closer review together.
3.1 Google Review Volume (Market-Relative) In your review
3.2 Review Response Discipline In your review
3.3 Before/After Gallery Depth & Consent In your review
3.4 Board Certification & Society Visibility In your review
3.5 Patient Evidence Beyond Stars 3 / 3
3.6 Innovation Leadership & First-Mover Evidence 0 / 3
4Content & Discoverability (incl. AEO)
50%
You already appear in AI search answers, which most practices do not. The drag is a blog whose newest post is about seven months old and site code that labels you only as a generic organization, not a medical practice or physician. Both make you look less current to patients and to AI.
4.1 Blog Recency & Topical Depth 0 / 3
4.2 Visibility in AI search 3 / 3
4.3 Schema Markup Completeness 1 / 3
4.4 Podcast/Video Content Indexing In your review
5Paid Media Presence
0%
No paid advertising is running on Meta, and other paid channels could not be confirmed from public data. This is not a failure, but it means every patient you reach is finding you unpaid. We would walk through what paid presence your competitors are running when we talk.
5.1 Meta Ad Activity & Creative Variety 0 / 3
5.2 Google Ads Presence (Competitive Terms) In your review
5.3 Landing Page Alignment In your review
6Social & Community
n/a
You have an Instagram account, but posting cadence, engagement, and content could not be measured from public data alone. Social is a coverage gap in this diagnostic rather than a scored weakness, and it is one of the areas we would review together with your own numbers in hand.
6.1 Instagram Posting Cadence In your review
6.2 Engagement Rate In your review
6.3 Content Mix Diversity In your review
6.4 Link-in-Bio Strategy In your review
6.5 Story Highlights Organization In your review
7Identity & Citation Consistency
67%
Your RealSelf presence is award-level, which helps. Small inconsistencies show between your Google listing and your site (name punctuation, a missing floor detail), and several directories like Yelp and Healthgrades were not verified. Mismatched details across the web can quietly confuse patients and search engines.
7.1 NAP Consistency Across Directories In your review
7.2 Aesthetic-Directory Presence 2 / 3
7.3 One consistent identity online In your review
7.4 Cross-Channel Brand Consistency In your review
Fractional Aesthetics

That is the whole read: 15 signals measured from what a patient can see. The rest we go through together.

Prepared for Specimen IX, a Nashville solo-brand surgical practice · July 28, 2026 · Rubric v1.1

Download this scorecard (PDF) ↓ All sixteen samples →

Want one for your practice?

Complimentary, no call required, and every scorecard is prepared and personally reviewed before it goes out. Leave your practice's website and yours is on its way.

Run my audit →