This is a sample. A real audit of a real practice, shown with identifying details removed.

The audit is the scorecard itself. The review is the thirty minutes we spend going through it together.

FAx

VISIBILITY
SCORECARD

Specimen VIII, a New Orleans dermatology and facial plastics practice
specimen-viii.example.com · July 28, 2026 · Tier 1 audit · Rubric v1.1
16
signals measured
Sample scorecard
More once we complete the manual review together.
Executive summary

Patients comparing New Orleans dermatology and facial plastics practices see a strong website but a thin Google presence, and your visibility. That puts you in the room-for-improvement range, with your Google Business Profile the single weakest link between a search and a booked consult. Worth a closer look together.

What the audit found

Strengths

+A clear booking button where patients look firstWebsite and booking

Your "Schedule Online" button sits at the top of the mobile screen and scored 3 out of 3. A patient ready to act finds the next step without scrolling, so you lose fewer of them at the moment of intent.

+Deep treatment pagesWebsite and booking

You have 40-plus dedicated pages for branded treatments like NeoGraft, SmartGraft, and CoolSculpting. A patient searching a specific procedure lands on a page built for it, which reads as depth and holds attention.

+Written patient storiesReputation and proof

Eight named testimonials that mention specific services scored 2 out of 3. Named, procedure-specific stories carry more weight with a hesitant patient than a star rating alone.

+Named in AI search answersContent and discoverability

In a scan of AI search (the answers ChatGPT and Google's AI give patients), your practice was named in about one in six answers and your site cited as a source. Scored 2 out of 4, this is real presence most practices lack.

Costliest gaps

No services listed on your Google profileLocal presence and Google

Your Google Business Profile shows Website and Directions buttons only, with no services section (0 out of 3). A patient scanning the map results sees less about what you do than practices that list procedures, so they tend to click those instead.

Google reads you as a spa, not a specialistLocal presence and Google

After generic types are set aside, your profile leaves "spa" and "doctor" (1 out of 3). Google struggles to match you to dermatology and facial plastics searches, so you surface for fewer of the terms patients actually type.

Empty questions section on GoogleLocal presence and Google

Your Google profile's Q&A section has zero entries (0 out of 3). Patients asking common questions there see silence, and an unanswered space reads as a practice that is not paying attention.

Two different phone numbers on recordIdentity and listings

Your Google profile and your own notes list different phone numbers (1 out of 3). When a patient finds conflicting contact details, some hesitate to call, and search engines trust an inconsistent listing less.

No distinct positioningReputation and proof

Your bios show strong credentials but no first-mover or innovation claim in your market (0 out of 3). A patient weighing several qualified practices sees no reason you stand apart, so the choice tilts on price or proximity.

The path forward

Discuss the findings

Let's sit down and walk through what patients see when they compare you to other New Orleans practices. The conversation turns a strong website into a strong first impression everywhere a patient looks.

Lazar preps before the call: no services listed on your Google profile, and google reads you as a spa, not a specialist, both mapped in advance, plus every item marked In your review, ready to walk through together.

Book your 30-minute review →

Lazar LaLone · lazar@fractionalaesthetics.com · (412) 944-5506

Methodology

The goal: a diagnostic read of what a patient, or a referring doctor, sees from the outside, working only from what is openly on display and never from the practice's own dashboards or private analytics. It intentionally does not prescribe fixes, because effective solutions need further conversation and analysis to get right.

Rubric
Aesthetic Practice Visibility Scorecard v1.1, 100-point composite
Two kinds of number
Scores of 0 to 3 are ours, applied from this rubric. Figures such as Google's PageSpeed result, your star rating, review counts and follower counts are third-party measurements we read and report, not numbers we assign
This audit
Tier 1, the complimentary read. Every one of the 34 signals is drawn from patient-facing data. Tier 2 adds paid-media spend analysis, and only when you choose to share your ad data.
Signals
16 measured from patient-facing data so far; the rest walked through together in your review
Review items
Excluded from both earned and maximum points; they never count against the practice, and we look at them together in your review
Generated
July 28, 2026
Category breakdown
IN YOUR REVIEW = these signals need a closer look than patient-facing data alone allows, so we walk through them together in your review. They are excluded from the score entirely and never count against the practice.
1Local Search Visibility
25%
This is your weakest area at 25 percent. Your Google Business Profile is claimed and lists hours and categories, but it carries no services menu and an empty questions section, and Google reads you closer to a spa than a specialist. A patient scanning the map results sees less than they see on competing profiles.
1.1 GBP Claim & Completeness 2 / 3
1.2 GBP Categories 1 / 3
1.3 Service Menu on GBP 0 / 3
1.4 GBP Photo Volume & Recency In your review
1.5 GBP Posts Frequency In your review
1.6 Local Pack Presence (Primary Terms) In your review
1.7 Q&A Section Activation 0 / 3
2Website & Infrastructure
75%
Your strongest area at 74 percent. The booking button sits where patients look, your treatment pages are deep, and scheduling works. Mobile speed at 56 is middling, which slows some patients on phones. We will walk through financing visibility together, which the public pages alone did not settle.
2.1 Mobile Speed Score 2 / 3
2.2 Above-the-Fold Booking CTA 3 / 3
2.3 Online Scheduling Integration 2 / 3
2.4 Branded Treatment Page Coverage 2 / 3
2.5 Financing Surfacing In your review
3Reputation, Trust & Innovation
34%
Both physicians are board-certified and eight named testimonials back you up. The credential is easy to miss beyond the bio pages, and nothing on the site signals what sets you apart. Review volume and your before-and-after gallery need a closer look than public data allowed.
3.1 Google Review Volume (Market-Relative) In your review
3.2 Review Response Discipline In your review
3.3 Before/After Gallery Depth & Consent In your review
3.4 Board Certification & Society Visibility 1 / 3
3.5 Patient Evidence Beyond Stars 2 / 3
3.6 Innovation Leadership & First-Mover Evidence 0 / 3
4Content & Discoverability (incl. AEO)
47%
A real bright spot given the category: AI search names you in roughly one in six answers, and your code labels for search engines are largely in place. There is no indexed video or podcast content, and blog activity needs a look we could not complete from the public site.
4.1 Blog Recency & Topical Depth In your review
4.2 Visibility in AI search 2 / 3
4.3 Schema Markup Completeness 2 / 3
4.4 Podcast/Video Content Indexing 0 / 3
5Paid Media Presence
0%
No paid activity showed up. The Meta ad search returned nothing running, and Google Ads presence needs a paste-in we did not have. This is a coverage note, not a verdict; paid media is a choice, and we would talk through whether it fits you at all.
5.1 Meta Ad Activity & Creative Variety 0 / 3
5.2 Google Ads Presence (Competitive Terms) In your review
5.3 Landing Page Alignment In your review
6Social & Community
n/a
Your Instagram account is linked from the site, but no posting, engagement, or content data was available to score, so this whole area is unmeasured for now. We walk through it together in the review rather than guess from a single link.
6.1 Instagram Posting Cadence In your review
6.2 Engagement Rate In your review
6.3 Content Mix Diversity In your review
6.4 Link-in-Bio Strategy In your review
6.5 Story Highlights Organization In your review
7Identity & Citation Consistency
34%
Two phone numbers appear across your listings, which can make a patient hesitate to call. Your presence on aesthetic directories and any legacy listings need the closer look we do together, since public data covered only part of the picture.
7.1 NAP Consistency Across Directories 1 / 3
7.2 Aesthetic-Directory Presence In your review
7.3 One consistent identity online In your review
7.4 Cross-Channel Brand Consistency In your review
Fractional Aesthetics

That is the whole read: 16 signals measured from what a patient can see. The rest we go through together.

Prepared for Specimen VIII, a New Orleans dermatology and facial plastics practice · July 28, 2026 · Rubric v1.1

Download this scorecard (PDF) ↓ All sixteen samples →

Want one for your practice?

Complimentary, no call required, and every scorecard is prepared and personally reviewed before it goes out. Leave your practice's website and yours is on its way.

Run my audit →