This is a sample. A real audit of a real practice, shown with identifying details removed.

The audit is the scorecard itself. The review is the thirty minutes we spend going through it together.

FAx

VISIBILITY
SCORECARD

Specimen XV, a Vancouver laser and skin clinic group
specimen-xv.example.com · July 28, 2026 · Tier 1 audit · Rubric v1.1
12
signals measured
Sample scorecard
More once we complete the manual review together.
Executive summary

Your visibility sits in the typical range for your market: motivated patients find you, but you lose ground weekly to clearer competitors. The biggest exposure is your Google profile, where an empty Q&A section and a thin listing leave easy questions unanswered. That is worth a conversation.

What the audit found

Strengths

+You already show up in AI search answersContent and discoverability

Across 90 AI answers (the responses ChatGPT and Google's AI give patients), your practice was named 46% of the time and your site was cited with a link 41% of the time. Patients asking AI for a clinic often see you.

+Your booking button is easy to findWebsite and booking

A prominent "Book Now" button sits above the fold on mobile and links straight to your scheduling. A patient ready to book does not have to hunt for the next step.

+Your Google categories are well matchedLocal presence and Google

Your Google profile carries a strong set of aesthetic-relevant categories, so when patients search for the treatments you offer, Google has clear reason to surface you.

+An active, locally relevant blogContent and discoverability

Your blog runs current-year, procedure-specific content in both English and Chinese for the Vancouver market. That local relevance helps patients and search engines connect you to real treatments.

Costliest gaps

Your Google Q&A section is emptyLocal presence and Google

The Q&A section on your Google profile has zero questions answered. Patients comparing clinics see a blank space where competitors answer common questions, and they tend to pick the practice that looks more responsive.

Your site's code labels are basicContent and discoverability

Your site carries only generic Organization code labels (the code that tells search engines what your business is), with no medical or clinic labels. Search engines and AI understand less about you, so you surface less often for the right searches.

Financing shows up in only one placeWebsite and booking

Financing language appears on your homepage but not on treatment pages or the booking flow. Patients weighing cost decide on a specific procedure page, and if they do not see it there, some drop off before booking.

Your Google profile is thinLocal presence and Google

Your profile has hours, categories, and accessibility filled in, but website link, description, services, and photos are missing. Patients scanning results see a fuller competitor first and are more likely to click them.

Booking sends patients off your siteWebsite and booking

Your "Book Now" button routes patients to a separate scheduling site rather than booking on your own pages. Each handoff is a point where some patients hesitate and leave.

The path forward

Discuss the findings

Let's sit down and walk through what the audit found and what it means for your clinic. The conversation turns a middling profile into one patients pick first.

Lazar preps before the call: your Google Q&A section is empty, and your site's code labels are basic, both mapped in advance, plus every item marked In your review, ready to walk through together.

Book your 30-minute review →

Lazar LaLone · lazar@fractionalaesthetics.com · (412) 944-5506

Methodology

The goal: a diagnostic read of what a patient, or a referring doctor, sees from the outside, working only from what is openly on display and never from the practice's own dashboards or private analytics. It intentionally does not prescribe fixes, because effective solutions need further conversation and analysis to get right.

Rubric
Aesthetic Practice Visibility Scorecard v1.1, 100-point composite
Two kinds of number
Scores of 0 to 3 are ours, applied from this rubric. Figures such as Google's PageSpeed result, your star rating, review counts and follower counts are third-party measurements we read and report, not numbers we assign
This audit
Tier 1, the complimentary read. Every one of the 34 signals is drawn from patient-facing data. Tier 2 adds paid-media spend analysis, and only when you choose to share your ad data.
Signals
12 measured from patient-facing data so far; the rest walked through together in your review
Review items
Excluded from both earned and maximum points; they never count against the practice, and we look at them together in your review
Generated
July 28, 2026
Category breakdown
IN YOUR REVIEW = these signals need a closer look than patient-facing data alone allows, so we walk through them together in your review. They are excluded from the score entirely and never count against the practice.
1Local Search Visibility
59%
Your Google profile has the right categories and a recent post, which helps you surface. The weak spot is an empty Q&A section and a thin listing missing website link, description, services, and photos. Patients scanning results tend to click the fuller competitor first. Photos and map ranking need a closer look together.
1.1 GBP Claim & Completeness 2 / 3
1.2 GBP Categories 3 / 3
1.3 Service Menu on GBP In your review
1.4 GBP Photo Volume & Recency In your review
1.5 GBP Posts Frequency 2 / 3
1.6 Local Pack Presence (Primary Terms) In your review
1.7 Q&A Section Activation 0 / 3
2Website & Infrastructure
67%
Your mobile site loads at a middling speed and your "Book Now" button is easy to spot, both real assets. Booking hands patients off to a separate site, and financing appears only on your homepage. Both are points where a ready patient can hesitate and drift to a clearer competitor.
2.1 Mobile Speed Score 2 / 3
2.2 Above-the-Fold Booking CTA 3 / 3
2.3 Online Scheduling Integration 2 / 3
2.4 Branded Treatment Page Coverage In your review
2.5 Financing Surfacing 1 / 3
3Reputation, Trust & Innovation
n/a
Reputation, reviews, before-and-after galleries, and board certification were not scored in this pass because patient-facing data alone cannot confirm them. These carry real weight in how patients choose a clinic, so we walk through them together in the review rather than guess.
3.1 Google Review Volume (Market-Relative) In your review
3.2 Review Response Discipline In your review
3.3 Before/After Gallery Depth & Consent In your review
3.4 Board Certification & Society Visibility In your review
3.5 Patient Evidence Beyond Stars In your review
3.6 Innovation Leadership & First-Mover Evidence In your review
4Content & Discoverability (incl. AEO)
70%
This is your strongest area. You already appear in AI search answers (what ChatGPT and Google's AI tell patients) and run a locally relevant bilingual blog. The gap is basic site code labels with no medical or clinic tags, so search engines understand less about you than they could.
4.1 Blog Recency & Topical Depth 2 / 3
4.2 Visibility in AI search 3 / 3
4.3 Schema Markup Completeness 1 / 3
4.4 Podcast/Video Content Indexing In your review
5Paid Media Presence
n/a
Paid media was not verified this pass, so whether you run ads and how they perform is open. This is a full area to walk through together rather than score from the outside.
5.1 Meta Ad Activity & Creative Variety In your review
5.2 Google Ads Presence (Competitive Terms) In your review
5.3 Landing Page Alignment In your review
6Social & Community
67%
Your Instagram has a Linktree bio hub with multiple links and existing story highlights, both working. Posting cadence, engagement, and content mix could not be retrieved, so how active and organized the account looks to a browsing patient is something we review together.
6.1 Instagram Posting Cadence In your review
6.2 Engagement Rate In your review
6.3 Content Mix Diversity In your review
6.4 Link-in-Bio Strategy 2 / 3
6.5 Story Highlights Organization In your review
7Identity & Citation Consistency
n/a
Directory consistency, your name, address, and phone number across listings, and any legacy branding could not be scored from public data. Fragmented or stale listings quietly cost patients, so this is a priority to walk through in the review.
7.1 NAP Consistency Across Directories In your review
7.2 Aesthetic-Directory Presence In your review
7.3 One consistent identity online In your review
7.4 Cross-Channel Brand Consistency In your review
Fractional Aesthetics

That is the whole read: 12 signals measured from what a patient can see. The rest we go through together.

Prepared for Specimen XV, a Vancouver laser and skin clinic group · July 28, 2026 · Rubric v1.1

Download this scorecard (PDF) ↓ All sixteen samples →

Want one for your practice?

Complimentary, no call required, and every scorecard is prepared and personally reviewed before it goes out. Leave your practice's website and yours is on its way.

Run my audit →